Screw Akamai

So in the interest of time management I'm going to preview Fridays games now and possibly by the time I'm finished so will have Thursdays games, allowing me to review them. Get it? Before we do though, two quick fingers up to the NFL: -- If, like me, you've found the video viewing experience on NFL.com to be nothing short of a hair-loss inducing nightmare then there is hope. Providing you're not that bothered about seeing Rich Eisens head in HD, you can now disable the Akamai Net sessions program that was previously required to watch almost all of the videos. Just got to your computers C drive (usually under the heading 'computer'), then find the folder Program Files. In this you will find another folder called common files. In this you will find another folder headed 'Akamai'. Open this and you should see a heavenly little red icon that says Uninstall. Double click and then relax, safe in the knowledge that you will now be able to watch videos without anywhere near as much hassle as before. Maybe if enough people stop running it NFL.com will get the f***ing hint. -- Second finger up to the NFL over the 18-game schedule. All along Roger Goodell - the crown prince of football evil - has been telling us that fans fully support the proposed schedule increase. Well, I'd like to firmly say f**k you Roger. Naturally the owners meeting has been widely reported across the interweb and everywhere you go you notice a surprising trend in the comments section; the ratio of fans against the 'Enhanced Season' compared to those in favour seems to be about 4:1. Most fans with a brain and a semblance of logic seemed to understand that this is nothing but an attempt to extract more cash from the TV networks, while doing little to actually 'enhance' the game. While they admit that pre-season games aren't exactly thrilling, they seem very understanding of the way it will effect both the players long term health and the reduced chances of fringe players to make the roster, coming to the conclusion that the 'enhanced season' is garbage (though not always quite as politely as that). I don't think fans are being given enough credit for their intelligence and I get the feeling that this could potentially blow up in Goodell's face, hopefully sooner rather than later. Enough of that though, let's take a look at Fridays games: -- Falcons @ Dolphins: The Falcons were supposed to give the Saints a run for their money in the NFC South this year. The Dolphins were supposed to be the upstarts challenging the big mouth Jets and the stoic old Patriots for the AFC East. So far, both teams have looked flat. Brandon Marshall hasn't raised the Dolphins as might be expected. He had a good game last week, but there are almost daily reports from the 'phins practices of drops and frustrations. Meanwhile the Falcons seem to be struggling to really get Michael Turner involved in their games. This could go either way to be honest. It could be two teams slopping it out in a puke fest of a football game, or it could see one team finally realise that once the pre-season is done then it's live time and so sending them into a scoring fury. I'll be getting my bucket I think. -- Redskins @ Jets: After coming up short (well short) against the Ravens, the Redskins will be looking to bounce back against a Jets teams that is still missing Monsieur Revis and that looked abject against the Panthers (hate 'em). Without Thomas Jones the Jets offense looks a little barren. Mark Sanchez is still struggling to find form and find receivers. The Redskins D may not have held up all that well against Baltimore, but they're still a tough unit and second year linebacker Brian Orakpo continues to improve in leaps and bounds, meaning a tough day in store for Sanchez. Donovan McNabb on the other hand has been producing good yards through the air, but like in Philadelphia seems to struggle in the Red zone still. The situation is not helped by the Redskins having the same problem as the Eagles; no run game. Despite their splash of off season acquisitions at the RB position, the Redskins have been unable to get things moving on the ground. The point is well proven when in sight of goal and with no apparent method of scoring other than trying to find Chris Cooley or Fred Davis, who are routinely finding themselves drawing heavy coverage. So this game comes down to offense. Which team can finally pull its O out of a slump and find some scores? Judging by the way they've both performed so far, both these teams are going to be looking back at the pre-season optimism and wondering where it all went wrong. -- Chargers @ Saints: Philip Rivers vs. Drew Brees. It's a battle that many have been looking forward to seeing and could prove to be one of the more interesting games of the pre-season. Certainly the Saints defense will be under the spotlight. Mid ranked last year, they've long been the weak link that's kept this team from the Super bowl prior to 2009. It might not be enough this year, as the Saints offense is unlikely to repeat the very gaudy numbers that it put up last season. The combination of Ryan Matthews on the ground and Rivers through the air will either leave Saints fans anxious about the season ahead, or optimistic of a repeat. For the Saints it's very much about the run. As I've stated before on numerous occasions, the Saints scored a ton of points off play-action last year. This year their rushing attack promises to be less than stellar, leaving question marks as to how much respect it will receive. A solid outing here for the Saints backs would do wonders. This is also a Chargers D that is recovering from the loss of Antonio Cromartie, so is ripe for a kicking by Brees. -- Eagles @ Chiefs: The Eagles have looked pretty good so far. Not sensational, but good. Kolb is settling as the starting QB and starting to look at home. The Chiefs are.... well. Not good. With the changes in coordinators and a pretty solid draft under the belt, plus the pick up of Thomas Jones at RB, the Chiefs looked like they were set for a season that might just appease the fans a little. So far however it just hasn't come together for them. As we're in week 3 of the pre-season I'm anticipating seeing a little more from Mr. Jones and Mr. Charles in the Chiefs backfield. The Eagles conversely are looking for a plump piece of game to poach and the Chiefs just might be it. Brandon Graham has been moved up the depth chart ahead of Juqua Parker, which is surprising considering the season Parker had last year. I think the Eagles are either grossly under rating Parker or Brandon Graham is a hell of a lot better than we all imagined. Offensively the Eagles might be keen to unleash DeSean Jackson on a secondary that remains suspect. Right, results time: -- Rams @ Patriots: ............................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................. ............... 36 - 35. No, no, no, I mean 36 to the Rams. Yes. Rams 36, Patriots 35. Wait, let me just check again, make sure. Jesus. For a long time in this game, the Rams led comfortably. A rally that began in the end of the third quarter brought the status quo back, only for the Rams to upset the balance and come back with a TD and finally a last second field goal to win. The crazy thing is, Brady took home 18/22 for 273 yards and 3 TDs. Even Brian Hoyer came in and lobbed himself a score. Randy Moss; 3 catches for 74-yards and a TD. Rob Gronkowski; 3 receptions for 66 yards and 2 TDs. This must have been gutting, to do so well only to get wrecked at the last second by a field goal. Sam Bradford impressed for the Rams, finishing with 15/22 for 189-yards and 2 TDs. Thaddeus Lewis also played well with 11/14 for 120-yards and a TD. Tight End, Michael Hoomanawanui (I promise you, that's his real name) led the Rams receivers with 4 catches for 53-yards and 2 TDs. The only real defensive stand out for the game was Patriots Linebacker Jerod Mayo who finished with 8 tackles and 2 assists. -- Colts @ Packers: This one hasn't actually finished yet. Satisfyingly though the Colts are getting pounded into the floor and "The Painted One" has just fumbled the ball again.... and then sacked two plays later. I'm gonna have a ciggie then I'll be back in a bit to recap this one. Hahahaha! 24-59. Man the crowd in Lambeau were rewarded for their good turn out. Who says pre-season games are boring? Having exchanged TDs in the first quarter, the Colts tacked on a field goal and then a 2nd quarter TD to take the early lead. And from their it all unravelled. A TD from Rodgers to Finley, then a muffed Punt by the Colts was recovered by Packers FB Korey Hall in the endzone for another TD. Add another Rodgers TD pass and the Packers were pulling away at half time. A field goal followed in the third followed by another TD and the Colts were almost done, with Donald Brown providing scant relief with his 1-yard TD run. But the Packers weren't finished yet. Another TD pass by Matt Flynn, a rushing TD by Kregg Lumpkin, and then a 75-yard punt return for a TD by Jason Chery finished the job. Rodgers finished 21/29 for 195-yards and 3 TDs. Matt Flynn; 8/13 for 80-yards, 2TDs. On the Colts side Peyton Manning managed 15/26 for 214-yards and 2 TDs, 1 INT while Curtis Painter finished the game 6/11 for 97-yards and an INT. Manning had one fumble, Painter two. Defensively the Colts failed to produce a single sack but good showings from Antoine Bethea (8 tackles and an assist) & rookie LB Pat Angerer (7 tackles - 3 assists) at least provide some bright spot among the gloom. CB Tramon Williams led the Packers in tackles with 6 and there were some good showings from some rookies (which they wouldn't have otherwise had under the 18-game 'enhanced season'). Rookie LB Frank Zombo finished with 5 tackles, 4 assists, and a sack/forced fumble. The other sack came from rookie LB Cyril Obiozor. Rookie DBs Morgan Burnett and Sam Shields came up with the Packers two picks. Well, there you have it. The Colts are beatable. The Packers just get better by the week. And I'm off so I'll see you guys tomorrow to preview Saturdays games and recap all the Friday Night action. If you have any questions etc, you can leave a comment or drop me an e-mail at keepingthechainsmoving@live.co.uk Any free publicity you'd like to swing my way would also be more than welcome. Till next time, Have a great day everyone.

Fumbling around for answers.

It's not quite picks time yet, but I just had two random observations to bring up that suddenly came to me. 1) Marvin Harrison. Yeah he might be 37 years old now. But the fact is Harrison is far superior to a plethora of wideouts who are currently chewing up roster space on many teams. Why didn't anyone come in for the guy in the offseason? 2) Fumbles. 2009 might just be looked back on as the year of the fumble. Honestly, it's everywhere. Steve Slaton has basically lost the starting job in Houston to rookie Ryan Moats because of his problems holding onto the football. And yet all of this seems so unnecessary. I've been going back and watching a ton of film. And I mean it. Tons of film. And what consistently crops up is examples of ball security that would make little kids blush with embarassment. The old adage is four points of pressure (tip of the ball, forearm, crook of the elbow and bicep). Many would go so far as to make it 5 (pinning the ball against the chest). What you see week in and week out in the NFL is two (fingers on the tip and against the forearm). No wonder the balls getting dumped on the turf every 5 seconds. And the genuine question is, who coaches these guys? If you're a top NFL coach, isn't it your responsibility to fix this problem? I don't wanna sound like your average armchair coach (even though technically speaking, I am) but isn't the 4 (or 5) points of pressure a basic standard of football across all levels? And with turnovers having such a huge impact on games, isn't it something that you think would be addressed everyday in practice, till it became routine? I don't know. I'm no genius. But I sure as hell know I wouldn't pay a coach if he allowed that kind of thing to continue. Rant over. Later tonight I'll stick my neck on the line again and produce some week 9 picks. So far in the two weeks I've been doing this, I'm 18-8. which is just under 70% (like 0.01% under). This week there are some real toughies (like last week, and the week before....) but I'm actually quite confident about going 13-0 this week. But then I was confident the Dolphins would beat the Saints in week 7....

Drawing a Blank

Just to give you a heads up, tomorrow I'll be making my picks for week 9 of the NFL and on Saturday I'll be taking a look at why I think the power running game might soon become the new must have offense. Again. As for today, I've drawn a blank. Honestly. Cant think of a single thing to write about. Well I guess I could. I could write a whole page on why I think the Saints are over rated and predict some of the surprised expressions that people will come out with when they fall apart in late end of the season. I could write about why I think the Patriots are still contenders for the big crown this year, even after some disappointing losses early on. I could write about why the Titans still have an outside shot at the playoffs, even after their abysmal start to the season. I could write about why the NFC East could be possibly the biggest disappointment this year in terms of it's playoff contributions. I could write about why I think the NFC West may just spring to life in the next few years. I could tell you all about why I think the Rams may bizarrely finish the season on a high (by their standards at least). I guess there is a lot to talk about. But I don't want to bore you with the details. Yet.....

We're talking about "Holy crap, that was one hell of a hit... oh wait, he didn't have the ball" type interference

Recently I bashed NFL networks Mike Mayock a little for some analysis that he did. Today I just watched a couple of videos on NFL.com that re-affirmed why, overall, I think he's top notch. Basically it revolves around two plays; Jabari Greers interception against the Falcons, and Leonard Weavers TD run against the Giants. The point he made was that in both cases the play had a big effect on the game, and in both cases, the plays should have been scrubbed by penalties. Now first up let me point out that this is not an argument or attack on the referees. The NFL is, at least in my opinion, one of the leading sports in the world for officiating. We now have several umpires dotted around the field (though I wish they'd remove the official from amongst the linebackers), there are TV replays, booth reviews inside of 2 mins and coaches have the challenge ability as well. Compared to the officiating of many other sports, and in particular I'm levelling my finger at Soccer in Europe, the officiating in the NFL is exceptional. But still, humans are humans, mistakes will be made. And so it was that the Saints got away with pass interference and the Eagles got away with holding. In the Eagles case it was Brent Celek who got a reasonably blatant hold of, I believe, Justin Tuck. This prevented Tuck making a tackle that would have stuffed the play for no gain. That's how much of a swing we're talking about. No gain compared to a touchdown. And that has an affect on teams. It has an affect on defenses and coaches. It affects the outcome of the game. And it's why I'm still a little apprehensive about the Eagles rushing attack. The next is gonna seem like pure bullying. I pick on the Saints every week it seems. But hey, if you wanna be the best 1) expect everyone to be taking shots at you and 2) expect to have to prove it on a regular basis. And what Mike Mayock proved was that Greer's interception was the result of nothing shorter than blatant pass interference. Not by Greer (I forget who it was). But it was blatant. Honestly, we're not talking about "now, does that level of contact constitute interference" type interference. We're talking about "Holy crap, that was one hell of a hit... oh wait, he didn't have the ball" type interference. And without it and the resulting pick 6 it created, we finish with a tie game. So what is this all in aid of? Nothing more really than a rant. Just to point out that the Saints aren't all they're being made out to be and the Eagles rushing attack may well collapse this week. Oh and yeah, there was some love on NFL Total Access for Darren Sharper. And yeah, it included the jump ball interception. And no, no-one gave Tracy Porter, Greer or Randall Gay the credit they deserve. It's all about the numbers. Which is why NFL scouts end up picking some real duds. (*cough* JaMarcus Russell *cough*)

Trawling the net for Football gems.

So today I've been browsing around the web etc and checking out what's generally going on in the football world and so here I present to you some of my humble observations: 1) I read an article about Quarterbacking, which to cut a long story short, bemoaned the lack of quality teaching today regarding a QB's arm position during the throw. The writer included a piece by a well known QB coach (who advertises on his site. Just thought I'd mention that). In the way that seems all to typical of college coaches now (which both the writer and his sponsor, sorry, contributor are), he levelled the lofty finger of criticism at the pros. It was the usual, "they don't really understand football, not like we do in Division 3...." type of thing. The most severe critique was saved for the way pro coaches obsess over footwork. And to be honest, the pro coaches have this one in the bag. Stand in the middle of a field, feet shoulder with apart and facing forward, and throw a ball to a friend using nothing more than your arm motion. Good luck with that by the way. It probably didn't travel very far. Now introduce the hips. And now finally the legs and feet, allowing yourself to coil back and throw. The power in the proverbial "Big arm" comes from using the whole body as a sling. Generating power begins in the legs and the hips. To do this properly, to allow yourself to follow through completely, you must first plant your feet properly. Hence the seemingly inordinate amount of time that top QB coaches devote to footwork. 2) Talking of QB's, Brett Favre comes to mind. The stats are good. He's completing about 68% of his passes (174/256), for 1,925 yds total and an average of 7.5 yds per completion. But what really sticks out is the business end of the numbers. 16 TD's, matched only by Matt Schaub and Drew Brees. But what he has that they don't is just 3 INT's, (compared to 6 & 7 for Brees and Schaub respectively). This is what is marking him out for possibly his greatest season yet. The old gunslinger from the south has tempered his game a little, reducing turnovers to help a team that features a fantastic RB and a great D. All the while, still finding time to put points on the board. Watching him in action, he really does look superb this season. If he and the Vikings were to win the Superbowl this year, it would be thoroughly, thoroughly, deserved. 3) Lot of talk around about firing head coaches. Eric Mangini should top that list. The Redskins, the Rams, the Lions, the Titans and the Raiders have all hardly set the world alight this year, but at least they've tried. At least they've gone about their business with a bit of guts in some places. Meanwhile the Browns trot out week on week and seem to dissolve in front of our very eyes each week. Complaints among the players about their coach are rife. God knows how he acquired the title 'Man-genius', but I wish people would stop giving him that much credit. The argument currently in vogue is that firing Mangini now would serve no purpose, and that the Browns would not really progress at all as a club. Well hey, newsflash, this season the Browns have, somehow, regressed since last season. Mangini has made this team worse. A new coach may not fix all the problems now, but at least you'd be solving the franchises biggest problem, i.e. Mangini. 4) The consensus opinion among the great and the good of football analysis and commentary seems to be that the New Orleans Saints are the best team in football right now. And it's simply not true. There seems to be no other evidence for this decision that's been made than the fact that they're 7-0. Which on the surface seems fantastic. Except that the Colts are also 7-0, and they're a much better team. And lets not forget about the Denver Broncos, who at 6-0 were being touted as the previous best team in the NFL, the team that everyone now had to beat etc... until the Ravens torched them 30-7. Remember the Saints vs Dolphins a couple of weeks ago? You should, because were it not for some shocking play calling the Dolphins would have utterly embarrassed the "best team in the NFL right now". Then this week, they scrape past the Falcons. Yes people, the Falcons. Looking at some of the quality sides in the NFL who year on year produce great results, it's hard to get to excited about the Saints just yet. 5) In an interesting addition to the above, I thought it was quite amusing to see Darren Sharper lauded for his pick in last weeks game. This is the kind of thing I'm talking about with misplaced praise. It was a jump ball. There were at least 5 or 6 Saints just clamouring for a piece of that ball. Sharper was the one under it. Suddenly that's the mark of a great player, with the so often quoted phrase "ball hawk" being rolled out. If catching a last second desperation jump ball on the 20 yard line makes you great, then there's still hope for many a rubbish defensive player in the league. And all the while no-one is talking about the Saints combo of cornerbacks, Jabari Greer, Randall Gay and most importantly, Tracy Porter. 6) The praise so far for Vince Young has been overflowing from pretty much every orifice that the Internet has to offer. People saying how well he controlled the game, made no mistakes and just did enough to help the Titans win. Well I hate to point this out, but that's exactly what Kerry Collins did last year, except Collins is going to be a ton cheaper next year. Being a game manager is pretty easy for most quarterbacks, especially ones in Tennessee right now. Hand the ball off and let Johnson and White do all the damage. All you have to do is limit (read: eliminate) turnovers. Young can do that. Collins can do that. Hell, I could probably do that. What the Titans need to see from Young is this; if we get ourselves in a situation where we cant run the ball, can you lead us to victory? Flacco is starting to do it in Baltimore. Roethlisberger did it for Pittsburgh last year. That's the question that needs to be answered of Vince Young. Not, "if we play our normal style of running football, can we trust you to hand the ball off correctly?". 7) Everyone is crying about the recent slump of Giants Quarterback Eli Manning. Now, this deserves a reality check. No, that's not quite sufficient. It deserves a hard slap in the face. Eli is not his brother. He's not Philip Rivers, he's not Tom Brady, he's not Drew Brees, he's none of these people. What he is, is the brother of one of the best quarterbacks in the league, who happened to be the guy that was asked in Superbowl 42, to chuck what was for all intended purposes a 'hail mary' pass into the endzone, which was caught for a game winning touchdown. No more, no less. He's an average QB. He's ok, he's better than Brady Quinn or Derek Anderson. He's better than JaMarcus Russell. But he's still not good enough to take the game out of the hands of Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw, who would probably very much appreciate the ball not being constantly turned over at the QB position. That's just the facts. Manning is good. But he's no Manning. 8) The Packers defence is drawing a lot of heat lately, with a lot of talk about whether one of the defensive ends should line up on the LOS or 1 yard off it. Yes people, it's the old 4-3/3-4, let's-all-pretend-it-makes-a-huge-amount-of-difference debate once more this season. I'm always told in the greatest of confidence and without any hint of shame by people that it's to do with getting the right personnel in the right spot. Because of course, if you had a 330-pound nose tackle, you wouldn't dare put him in a 4-3 defence. God no!! Only a 3-4, etc, etc, the arguments go on. What the Packers might want to do is focus a bit more on their appalling O-line and their abysmal rushing attack. 9) Maurice Jones-Drew. So the story goes, he chose 32 as his Jersey number to remind him (and doubtless the world) that 32 teams passed on him first time around. It is widely believed that most teams considered him too small to succeed (approximately 5ft 7in). Only in the NFL could a short player like Jones-Drew be considered unsuitable for a position that requires a quick burst of speed, the ability to change directions rapidly and the ability to get your pads low on a tackler. That is all.

It's time to dish out some extra credit.

Falcons@ Saints (27-35): Well, I made a mistake. I took the Falcons. It seems going against the Saints is a bad idea lately. But not for long I think. Last week I took the Dolphins to beat them, and if it wasn't for a poor timeout decision right before halftime and then some bizarre playcalling decisions in the second half, they would have. This week 7 points separated the Falcons from a tie game. And so if Ryan hadn't thrown that pick six, it might have been a very different result. Yes the Saints won, but don't count on them to keep this up all season. The last few games they've come up quite lucky against teams that you wouldn't exactly call stellar. Expect a loss soon. So thanks to Brees and co. I'm now 8-5 this week. Bad, but still a winner overall. Time I think to dish out some extra credit: -- Ryan Moats (Broncos): For snapping up the chance to step into Houstons backfield. Went for 126 yds of 23 carries, with 3 TD's to boot. Nice work. -- Jairus Byrd (Bills): Another 2 interceptions this week for the Bills safety. Keeps playing well and making plays despite the abysmal lack of talent around him. I've always believed that shining on a good team is easy, shining on a bad one takes real talent. -- The Fans (Browns): For travelling to Chicago and paying to watch their awful team go about it's business. I don't know how they do it, but they do, and for that they are probably the most deserving of this weeks extra credit. -- Brett Ratliff (Browns): For not speaking out in the press against his coaches for not playing him. He may not have even started a game yet in the NFL, but he sure as hell can't be worse than Anderson or Quinn. -- Sam Hurd (Cowboys): While Miles Austin has established himself as the number 1 receiver and reaps all the credit, Hurd is quietly going about his business as the number three receiver. Only had one catch in the game against Seattle, but he took it 36 yds for a TD. -- Patrick Crayton (Cowboys): Doesn't seem to feature much in the pass game anymore, but credit to him for giving his special teams role the maximum effort and coming up with another special teams TD this week. -- Ted Ginn Jr. (Dolphins): 2 kickoff returns for TD's; one of 100 yds, the other of 101 yds. The guy has some class moves and is pretty tough for a wideout. Made a huge impact in his teams win against the Jets. -- The Defence (49'ers): Didn't give up a rushing touchdown and only conceded an aerial one when the Colts ran a trick play with Addai throwing to Reggie Wayne. That's a tough task against any team, let alone the Colts. More power to them. -- Donovan McNabb (Eagles): After two weeks of mediocrity, he hit back with 17/23 for 240 yds and 3 TD's versus the Giants. That's the kind of form the Eagles need from him every week if they're going to make it in the postseason this year. -- DeSean Jackson (Eagles): Only had three catches, but managed to squeeze 78 yds and a TD out of them. -- LeSean McCoy (Eagles): 11 carries is usually nothing for a RB, the kind of work you give to a second string complimentary back. McCoy used his to go 82 yds and notch up a TD. Look for the Eagles to snap up any rookie in next years draft with the word 'Sean' in his first name. -- Leonard Weaver (Eagles): Fullbacks seem to be a dying breed in the NFL of late. Shame. But Weaver doesn't care, that's why he went for 75 yds and a TD on his 8 carries. -- Chris Johnson (Titans): 24 carries, 228 yds and 2 TD's. That's a mean afternoons work and the Titans are gonna need more of that if they want to put some more numbers in the win coloumn. -- Maurice Jones-Drew (Jaguars): How can you not sympathise with the guy? He takes just 8 carries and turns them into 177 yds and 2 TD's. Not only does this not win his team the game, but he gets outshone in the running stakes by Chris Johnson! Don't worry though Maurice, I'm more impressed with your tally simple because of the lower number of carries. Must be hard to be this good and still have to watch your team throw the ball 27 times, completeing just 14 and throwing two picks. This man is the future of the franchise. -- David Garrad (Jaguars): Based on my comments above you'll probably find this strange. But the fact is on one of Jones-Drew's runs he managed to sprint down the field, overtake his RB and then block a guy backwards into the endzone to finish the score. That's determination and effort that will sit well with his team mates. If only more players were this driven. -- Brett Favre (Vikings): No one in the league is playing on Favres level right now. The fact he's 40 makes this all the more amazing. Completed 17/28 passes, for 244 yds and 4 TD's, no INT's. In a bizarre twist this season, Favre is the guy taking centre stage, with Peterson as his back up. And I can only think of one word to describe him right now; legendary. -- Aaron Rodgers (Packers): Went 26/41 passing, for 287 yds and 3 TD's with no INT's. In addition he led his team in rushing with 5 carries for 52 yds. Tries as hard as anyone in the league but can do it all alone. He needs some more work from his offensive line and in the draft the Packers need to go and get a great RB to take some of the load. -- Jared Allen (Vikings): 5 tackles, 3 sacks. Allen is a beast that is feeding off opposition QB's (mainly Rodgers). With Linebacker Chad Greenway and Cornerback Antoine Winfield (when he returns) this defensive unit is looking mean. Dare I say it, Superbowl mean? We'll see. -- DeAngelo Williams (Panthers): After a no doubt frustrating wait, Williams finally gets a game where he gets 23 carries, and he duly converted them into 158 yds. No touchdowns, but then that is what Jonathan Stewart is for. -- Jonathan Stewart (Panthers): Must have been amazed to have been given the ball 17 times. He only managed 87 yds (only?!) but also picked up 2 TD's to help the Panthers overcome a usually stout Cardinals D. Must have something to do with Warners 5 INT's.

Week 8 picks so far

Ok so now that all of Sundays action has finished, it's time to check the last of my picks (excluding tomorrows game obviously): Raiders @ Chargers (16-24): No real surprises here. The Raiders are bad, but the Chargers didn't exactly blow them off the field in a flurry of touchdowns. The Chargers do seem to have a habit lately of grinding results out. Jaguars @ Titans (13-30): Titans pick up there first win of the season and all you can say is wow! Not because they won, but because of Chris Johnson. 24 carries, 228 yds and 2 TD's suggests a hard days work at the office. Nice. And given the amount of additional rushing attempts by LenDale White and Vince Young, it means the Titans have suddenly realised that they're a rushing team again. Credit where it's due, Young threw 15/18 for 125 yds and a TD to help his team along. That's what the Titans need from the QB position, not a Peyton Manning equivalent. Gotta feel sorry for Maurice Jones Drew though, as on any other day you would expect 177 yds and 2 TD's off 8 (yes, eight) carries to be a match winning, highlight reel stealing performance. And 'cos I picked the Jags. Vikings @ Packers (38-26): 17/28, 244 yds, 4 TD's. I told you people, Favre-ageddon was on the cards. Truly though, Favre is playing exceptional football. Not just as good as Manning but better. This is honestly some of the best play I have ever seen from a QB. And with a talented group of receivers around him, a great Running Back behind him, and a great D on the opposite side of the ball, expect Favre to become the oldest QB ever to win a playoff game (currently Phil Simms; 39 years). Packers fans shouldn't be too disappointed though. They have a great upcoming QB, some of the best WRs in the NFL and probably the best pair of Cornerbacks anywhere. They'll achieve greatness again, one day. But for now, the Vikings boost my record this weekend. Panthers @ Cardinals (34-21): I officially dislike the Panthers. Maybe so far as to say hate. Jonathan Stewart; 17 carries, 87 yds, 2 TD's. DeAngelo Williams; 23 carries, 158 yds. Delhomme? 7/14, 90 yds and a TD. My prayers for the Panthers have been answered. About a week late. Just when I think the Cardinals are on to a winner again, the Panthers finally realise that the franchise does not revolve around Delhomme, and predictably they get back to winning ways. Biggest surprise though is Kurt Warner throwing 5 picks. Normally that's Delhommes job. Maybe it's a cursed jockstrap that Delhomme somehow secreted into his oppsing numbers locker? So, 8-4 this week. Even if the Falcons pull out the victory tomorrow over the Saints, that still leaves me just 9-4, 1 short of last weeks tally (10-3). At some point, once I've gotten over my Panthers malaise, I shall dish out the extra credit for the week. There's plenty to go around. Just one interesting point to leave you with. Rushing stats this week are up a huge amount. This follows a general trend around the league right now, made all the more hilarious since NFL.com and various other sites etc have gone into a "this is a quarterbacks league now" funk of late. If anything it's the opposite. Long live the running back!!

I hate the Panthers. Hate 'em.

With the early games finished, now is as good a time as any to catch up on some results and see how my picks for the week are doing, starting in Baltimore: Broncos @ Ravens (7-30): This pick was all the more satisfying due to the fact that everyone and his brother (and his uncle) seemed to be touting Denver as one of the leagues elite teams. You're not elite until you consistently (and by that I mean season on season) win lots of games and batter lowly opposition. The Ravens are one of the leagues elite teams. And today they proved it. Orton failed to throw a TD and the Broncos rushing attack was basically stuffed dead. Meanwhile Flacco and Rice kept the Ravens on course, plus a Lardarius Webb kick return for good measure. Texans @ Bills (31-10): There was a point in the first half that I was worried about this pick. No real need to fret. The Bills are the Bills, and that means at some point they were going to fold like a soggy pack of cards. The question is, who is Ryan Moats? I have no idea. But he bagged 126 yds and 3 TD's off 23 carries for the Texans against a typically abysmal Bills rush D. Browns @ Bears (6-30): Derek Anderson. 6 of 17 passing. That's really it. That's all that I need to say. Seahawks @ Cowboys (17-38): To be fair, the tale of the stats is pretty even. Ish. Romo got an extra TD and Barber ran one in, but other that not a huge lot to separate them. Dolphins @ Jets (30-25): Stats wise, this should have been all Jets. Sanchez doubled Henne's pass yardage and also his TD's. The Dolphins rush was... non existent. Enter stage left; Ted Ginn Jr. With 2 kick returns for TD's, totalling 201 yds between them. I have to admit, I got the pick right, but maybe not for the right reasons. Ah who cares, I picked it. 49'ers @ Colts (14-18): Ok, so yeah the Colts won. But man was this close, much closer than I thought it would be. It seems Alex Smith has found a so far solid connection with his TE Vernon Davis. But what jumps out more is the stats of Peyton Manning; 31/48, 347 yds, 0 TD. How do you get so many yards and no touchdown? Peyton Manning never ceases to amaze. 6-0 so far. Not bad. Giants @ Eagles (17-40): Damn Giants. On Friday I called this game the 'Battle of the Untrustworthy'. Go figure. A few weeks ago the Eagles couldn't, and hardly even attempted to, run the ball on the Raiders. The Raiders. Last week their offense sputtered and choked and finally overcame the Redskins. Then this week it went nuts and tore the Giants a proverbial new one. What happened? LeSean McCoy & Leonard Weaver, that's what. They combined for just 19 carries, but racked up 157 yds and 2 TD's. I'd take that kind of tandem over a single 'superback' any day of the week. Oh yeah, and I guess Donovan McNabb helped by going 17/23 for 240 yds and 3 TD's. That is more like what we've come to expect from the Eagles. Rams @ Lions (17-10): Do I have to mention this game? I do? God almighty. Well as you might expect, both teams lit up the scoreboard like.... a fundamentalist energy savers conference. Calvin Johnson didn't play, so predictably the Rams won. Steven Jackson even managed to rustle up a TD. And so those two downers leave me at 6-2 for the week. That leaves four remaining this evening and another on Monday night as the Falcons head down to New Orleans. Just peeking at the latest in the late games (??), it looks like my picks might be in trouble. Especially the Panthers @ Cardinals game. Wouldn't you just bloody credit it. As soon as I abandon Carolina for lack of use of their run game, they give the ball to Williams and in 5 carries he racks up 98 yds, while Stewart provides the punch, getting 2 TD's and 26 yds of his 5 carries. I hate the Panthers. Hate 'em.

Week 8 NFL picks.

Ok so it's Friday night (or morning here in the UK) and it's pick time. But first, a quick moan. Pro Bowl balloting has begun. In October. Half way through the season. Something has to be done about that. At least wait till the end of the regular season for gods sake...... Anyway, a tough week for picks, so let the pick-a-rama begin!!! Broncos@ Ravens -- Yeah, it's starting tough this week. Balls to the wall immediate tough pick. Both teams come off bye weeks and both teams have a lot to offer on both sides of the ball. But man do the Broncos look scary on offense. Kyle Orton may not be the best QB out there, but he has some awesome tools at his disposal. Defensively, Mike Nolan has turned this team into a top notch unit. Which makes it all the more surprising that I'm taking the Ravens. I just think Ray Lewis and co are gonna be out to make a statement in this game and if the Ravens run the ball a lot, which they should and I would highly recommend, then it forces Orton to throw a hell of a lot, and right into the waiting arms of Ed Reed. It's by no means a cert, but give me the Ravens in this one. Texans@ Bills -- Texans. That simple. Even if Andre Johnson doesn't play they still have dynamic back Steve Slaton and TE Owen Daniels. Don't be surprised if the Texans just blast the Bills off the face of the earth on Sunday. Browns@ Bears -- Are you kidding me? Bears. Bears, Bears, Bears. Jay Culter can relax and so can Matt Forte. It's simple. Even if Forte runs for minus yardage in this game and Cutler throws 5 picks, the Browns will still struggle to get two field goals. One of those deep balls has to connect and that'll be that. As for special teams, I like Josh Cribbs, but the Bears have both Knox and Hester to counter that. Once again, Bears. Seahawks@ Cowboys -- The 'hawks' are coming off a bye this Sunday and by about 5:00pm local time they'll be wishing they'd had an extension. I'm still not convinced that the 'Romo to Austin' connection is going to continue to put up the gaudy numbers all season. I am convinced that the Cowboys run game is good enough to cover and that the Seahawks are that bad. Cowboys for the win. Dolphins@ Jets -- Now we're talking tough games. Two teams who both like to run the ball. And by that I mean that they like to run the ball like Oprah likes to give away cars. Both teams are pretty physical defensively. Add to that a lot of bad blood and some pre-season handbags at dawn between Jets head coach Rex Ryan & Dolphins linebacker Channing Crowder, and we have the stage set for a great game. It may not be as high scoring as the last encounter, but it will be unmissable telly for those that can get the game. As for me, I can't watch it & to be honest I'm not sure if I can call it either. I think Mark Sanchez has an advantage over Chad Henne, but then I think the Dolphins have a big advantage in the run game. No offense to Thomas Jones and Shonne Greene who are probably set to post big numbers again this weekend, but I just think the Jets are gonna miss Kris Jenkins anchoring their line against the run on critical downs. While people are already prematurely proclaiming that the Saints defensive tactics from last week are the solution to the Wildcat problem, the fact is that Ronnie Brown and Ricky Williams have no problems plying their trade from a normal I-formation, straight down the middle into the belly of the beast. I think the Dolphins tip this one and make up for their disappointment last week. 49'ers@ Colts -- Ah the good ol' 49'ers. My beloved red and gold superstars (*cough*) will be rolling out in Indianapolis this week. And sadly, they're going to get creamed by the Colts. Yes Crabtree has good hands. Yes Vernon Davis is coming into his own. Yes Frank Gore is a great back. And yes, I'm pleased to see Alex Smith getting the starting job. But the Colts are still the Colts and sadly the 49'ers O-line are still the 49'ers O-line. Which means that Gore will find it difficult to find running lanes. Which means that Dwight Freeney will be battering Alex Smith all day long. And it means Bob Sanders will be battering everything that moves. Colts win this one. Damn. Giants@ Eagles -- Or as it's otherwise known, 'The Battle of the Untrustworthy". Eli Manning is unreliable. Donovan McNabb is unreliable. Brian Westbrook might start. But then again he might not. Michael Vick might come out and produce some Wildcat thunder and lightning. But then again, he might just be a damp squib. The Eagles might run the ball a lot to compensate for recent weeks. On the other hand, they may be worried about Westbrook and go pass crazy. I kind of fancy the Eagles for this one as I think they have more potential for explosive plays. But then again, without Brian Dawkins they don't look anywhere near as tough against the run. And Ahmad Bradshaw is on fire lately. So in conclusion and in tune with this games running theme, possibly the most unreliable pick of the week goes to the Giants. Giants to win. But then again.... Rams@ Lions -- If this fixture was a dog, it would have been taken outside and put out of it's misery. I think a lot of this game hinges on Lions receiver Calvin Johnson. If he plays, the Lions torch the Rams. If he doesn't, Steven Jackson torches them. That said, Jackson has a problem finding the endzone this season. But then that said, the Lions are just about as good a cure for that problem as any other team in the NFL right now. Ah to hell with it, I pick the Lions. Their uniforms blend better. Raiders@ Chargers -- God almighty. As if the previous fixture wasn't bad enough, then I rolled over this. Well, simply put the Raiders are dire and the Chargers are possibly on the brink of another miracle resurgence. I like the way they're introducing Darren Sproles as a third down threat with his pace and catching ability. And I like Philip Rivers 100 times out of 100 over JaMarcus Bust-ell. Didn't quite work did it? Well, neither does the Raiders offense so we're all square now. I'm backing San Diego. And at least it can't get much worse than this..... Jaguars@ Titans -- ....... famous last words. Apparently the Titans owner is pushing for Jeff Fischer to play Vince Young at QB. If they can mix that up with their potent two headed running attack (yes, that means you actually have to give the ball to LenDale White at least 10 times) then they have a chance. But it's still a slim one. On the opposite side, David Garrard is another QB who hardly sets the world on fire. But he is good. And more to the point, so is his franchise running back Maurice Jones Drew. These two actually have the potential to be a very good tandem, putting defenses in a bind and making headway for the Jaguars. But potential doesn't win football games. Only effort and talent. In that regard, I think the Jags still have an advantage. Give me the Jags in this one. Vikings@ Packers -- Lock your doors and go hide in the storm shelter, because it's Favre-ageddon!!!!!!! No lie. Apparently Packers fans are using the term to describe the result of a Vikings, and Brett Favre of course, win. And I think they may just be a little closer to the Apocalypse than many would give them credit. It would appear from doing a bit of checking around that the consensus opinion is that the Packers will win. Now, I know Aaron Rodgers is really coming along nicely. I know that the Packers WR corps ranks up there as among the very best in the business. I know that the Packers finally got there run game going last week. And I know that the Vikings are missing Antoine Winfield at Cornerback. But let's look at some of the other facts that may just be a bit more pertinent to the result. 1) Brett Favre is just as good as Aaron Rodgers. In fact, he's better. 2) The Vikings receivers have been outstanding this season. What they may lack in technique against Green Bay, they make up for in speed. 3) The Packers played the Browns last week. Yeah, those rushing stats don't seem so impressive now. And that's before we get onto the small matter of Adrian Peterson for the Vikings...... 4) The Vikings have Jared Allen at DE, which means Rogers will spend most of the game sitting down. 5) (yes, 5!!) The Vikings have Percy Harvin on special teams and the Packers have who? In summary. Vikings win. Favre-ageddon is coming! Panthers@ Cardinals -- They're already cracking open the champagne in Arizona as they take another step closer to the NFC West crown. Yes, the Panthers really are that bad. It doesn't matter who starts at QB this week. The strength of the Panthers lies in it's run game (as I'm sure you've guessed if you've read any of my previous posts this past week). Unfortunately for them, the Cardinals have the number 1 ranked rush defense. I have no idea quite how it happened, but it did. On top of that they have Kurt Warner, Larry Fitzgerald, Anquan Boldin, and Steve Breaston. And amazingly enough, they've even found a running game. Last week against the Giants they reminded everyone that Head Coach Ken Whisenhunt used to be the offensive coordinator for the Pittsburgh Steelers, as they rolled out a two tight end package and ran some power run plays. Granted, Chris 'Beanie' Wells and Tim Hightower still have a way to go before earning credits as as a running back tandem to be reckoned with, but it was a nice compliment to the Cardinals pass heavy attack. And it should be enough to see off a lacklustre Panthers team that is struggling to find itself offensively. Cardinals win at home in the desert. Falcons@ Saints -- Blockbuster potential? Maybe. We all know what the Saints can do with the ball. The question is, can the Falcons match them? Can Matt Ryan, Michael Turner, Roddy White and Tony Gonzalez match the pace of Drew Brees, Pierre Thomas, Marques Colston (and Devery Henderson. And Robert Meachem. And Lance Moore.) & Jeremy Shockey? Tough one to call. One piece of good news for the Falcons (in a slightly sadistic way) is that Heath Evans is injured. His threat as a receiver may not be all that, but he is certainly one of the keys to the New Orleans rushing attack, leading it's flurry of backs into the breach. But not any more. And that means a lot of the game will rest in the hands of Drew Brees. Which is bad. Perversely. I say this because the Saints lean heavily on the play action game to create scoring opportunities. Without a legit run game that goes out of the window. And it also exposes Brees to the speedy linemen of the Falcons. On the other side of the ball, Darren Sharper is making a name for himself by making plays. And he seems especially keen to pick on young quarterbacks, of which ilk Ryan still is. But as I said earlier in the week, it does leave holes to be exploited. So will the Saints defense be able to balance the need to stop Turner versus the need to shutdown Ryan and the play action? Hmm, tricky. Don't forget that in my opinion there was a compelling case that the Dolphins gave the Saints the win last week. And so with all that said and done, for the second week in a row, I'm going to bet against the smart money and take the Falcons. No doubt if the lord doesn't strike me down for doing so, Drew Brees will.......